Resin Injection Risks – A Foundation Stabilisation Failure

This case study presents a Melbourne house where resin injection, intended to stabilise the foundation, failed to improve structural issues and possibly worsened the situation, highlighting the limitations of this method.

When Quick Fixes Amplify Structural Damage

Close-up view of construction tools, materials, and documents, representing an in-depth exploration into resin injection techniques and their implications.

Buiding Type

Residential

Client

Homeowner

Overview

Resin injection ground engineering has a number of disadvantages, as we discussed in the blog post on the pros and cons of resin injection ground engineering.
One of the disadvantages is that it can actually make the problem worse in some cases, rather than improving it. Additionally, this method may not always produce the desired results in terms of differential movements of the house or floor levels.

Project Background

This particular project involved a house that was already significantly damaged and settled. Resin injection at one corner of the house not only failed to improve the overall condition but also made it even more complicated to stabilise the foundation and minimise subsequent damage.

Survey Results Analysis

Below is the brick course survey results conducted by a resin injection company at the house prior to injecting the resin which is compared to a brick course and floor level survey conducted by MFS Engineering approximately one year after the resin injection works were completed.

Brick course survey conducted by a resin injection company.
Brick course survey conducted by
a resin injection company
Brick course and floor level survey conducted by MFS Engineering approximately one year after the resin injection works.
Brick course and floor level survey conducted by
MFS Engineering approximately one year after
the resin injection works

It can be seen from the two surveys taken one year apart that the resin injection at this property has, in fact, invariably been inadequate and absolutely ineffective. Comparing cracks before and after the resin injection showed that most cracks had worsened.

Cracks prior to resin injection ground engineering work.
Cracks prior to resin injection ground engineering work
Cracks after resin injection ground engineering works
The same cracks after resin injection ground engineering works

When interviewing the homeowner, it was identified that the company who was engaged to carry out the resin injection works advised the owner that the trees located along the side of the house were the most probable culprit for the damage. However, they proceeded with injecting the resin below the footings without conducting any further investigation or consulting with a forensic engineer. They even promised the owner that their resin injection would lift the footings and solve the problem. This lack of proper investigation and reliance on a singular approach contributed to the very unsatisfactory outcome.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

It is important to note that simply injecting resin below the footings will not prevent further movements if the foundation soil is continually subjected to moisture variations. Therefore, it is crucial to address the root cause of the problem before proceeding with any ground engineering work. In this case, the trees were causing the settlement and removing them or installing a root barrier was the simplest solution to improve the performance of the footings.

Key Points: Lessons from Resin Injection Failure

  • Resin injection can worsen existing foundation problems instead of improving them
  • Effectiveness of resin injection varies and may not resolve differential movements
  • Survey comparisons showed resin injection was inadequate and ineffective in this case
  • Addressing the root cause (e.g., tree root management) is crucial before attempting foundation repairs
  • Simply injecting resin below footings doesn’t prevent further movements if soil moisture varies

Latest Case Studies

Discover Real-world Solutions—Dive into Our Latest Case Studies!

  • Efflorescence on basement ceiling beneath garden beds.

    Basement Water Seepage: The Hidden Threat of Efflorescence

    A Camberwell apartment building faces severe basement water seepage issues. Inadequate waterproofing of garden areas above leads to extensive efflorescence. This case study examines causes, effects, and solutions, emphasising early…

    Sara Khani

    4 minutes
  • Illustration of building damage from the Melbourne Earthquake, showing structural collapse and cracks.

    Damage Caused by Melbourne Earthquake September 2021

    A 5.9 magnitude earthquake hit Melbourne in September 2021, causing widespread concern among homeowners. This case study explores challenges in distinguishing earthquake-related damage from pre-existing issues in insurance claims.

    Sara Khani

    3 minutes
  • Artistic illustration of soil heave impact on a backyard spa

    The Impact of Soil Heave on Backyard Spa

    Soil heave severely damaged a Craigieburn homeowner’s backyard spa after heavy rains. This case study shows how improper installation led to structural issues and offers practical advice for protecting backyard…

    Sara Khani

    3 minutes
View All Case Studies